<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Official Publication of the National Center for Trauma Research</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Trauma Monthly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7464</Issn>
				<Volume>30</Volume>
				<Issue>6</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Pain and Surgical Outcomes in Ankle Fracture and Syndesmosis Injury: Comparing Screw and Flexible Fixation Methods in a Cohort Study</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1649</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>1656</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">234046</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30491/tm.2025.489826.1786</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Arash</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aris</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Trauma Institute,  Poursina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-0446-3489</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Kamran</FirstName>
					<LastName>Asadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Trauma Institute,  Poursina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-3885-1057</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Amir</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farhangi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Center, Trauma Institute,  Poursina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0009-0103-6543</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammadali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yazdanipour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Neuroscience Research Center, Trauma Institute, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-9084-0887</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nima</FirstName>
					<LastName>Faghirpour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Guilan Road Trauma Research Center, Trauma Institute, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0004-9270-9478</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #002060;&quot;&gt;Introduction: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;&quot;&gt;Although the importance of anatomical repair and fixation for syndesmotic injury has been emphasized, the best surgical approach remains a topic of discussion. This study sought to evaluate and compare the post-operative pain and surgical outcomes between screw fixation and the suture endobutton method in patients with Weber type C ankle fractures. &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #002060;&quot;&gt;Methods:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;&quot;&gt; A total of 56 consecutive patients with Weber type C ankle fractures participated in this prospective cohort study and underwent either screw fixation or suture endobutton surgery in 2022. Pain, infection, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were monitored 3, 6, and 12 months’ post-operation. &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #002060;&quot;&gt;Results:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;&quot;&gt; The study included 14 women and 42 men, aged 18 to 47 years. There were no differences in age and sex between the two surgical groups. The pain score was significantly lower in the suture endobutton group compared to the screw fixation group three months after the operation (P=0.042). However, the two groups had no significant differences in pain scores at six and twelve months. Within each treatment method, the pain scores were statistically significantly different over time (Ptotal&lt;0.001 in two groups). The suture endobutton method resulted in higher FAOS scores compared to the screw fixation method at three, six, and twelve months after surgery. The difference in this score within each group during the follow-up period was statistically significant (Ptotal&lt;0.001 in two groups).&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #002060;&quot;&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;mso-bidi-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin;&quot;&gt; The suture endobutton method has demonstrated advantages over screw fixation surgery. Patients have improved performance at three, six, and twelve months’ post-surgery, indicating that it may be a potentially superior approach to treating syndesmosis injuries. &lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ankle joint</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bone Screws</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Injury</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">orthopedic fixation devices</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Surgery</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.traumamon.com/article_234046_b43fba34744ea1a43572e6b3fd59d58f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
